At our nation’s inception it was important to have most national government entities in one central location: Washington D.C. This was because, at the time, geographical and technical constraints greatly hindered the exchange of thoughts and ideas.

Implementation of Rule 72 Initiative,

Centralization was the solution during that earlier time so as to prevent harmful delays to policy comprehension and implementation. There were only 13 original States and they were all located on the eastern side of the U.S. The nation has since expanded dramatically. With today’s advancements in technology there is no longer a need for centralization of all Headquarters in one city. This plan proposes that the Government connect with citizens by decentralizing various agencies while making use of new technology to become more efficient.

Policy and procedure for relocation of federal employees is already defined and codified. Through the General Services Administration (GSA) and affiliated business lines including the Public Buildings Service (PBS) and Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) these entities are responsible for office and location of federal employees. These agencies have been performing this function for decades and has all the necessary policies and procedures in place. There are no rules or policies to develop, therefore no additional cost. The direct and indirect benefits of dispersing the governmental agency Headquarters throughout the entirety of the nation are really great. In keeping with the basic core functions as defined by the United States Constitution Defense, Legislative, Diplomatic, and National Courts will remain in Washington D.C.

The basic needs and nature of a healthy, uniquely American Constitutional Republic society will not change.

The proposed idea will not alter fundamental services but instead will engage citizens while uniting the nation as never before. It will improve National Security, promote Prosperity, and enhance domestic Liberty.

The United States of America will remain a beacon of light and provide an example that individuals can and do live in harmony as law abiding individuals.

Location selection criteria

City & State

Benefit Economically
Not currently have a Federal Headquarters
Have a direct correlation to the Departments core and chartered responsibility

Average Housing Cost

At least 30% below that of the greater Washington D.C. region
Adequate supply of rental properties
Adequate supply of houses for sale

Cost of Living Index

At least 30% less than that of the greater Washington D.C. region

Vacancy

Plenty of benefits to the community by recycling and renovating existing and under used commercial properties
Residential vacancy rate supportive of a large influx of new residents

Commute

Average commute time is significantly reduced relative that of the greater Washington D.C. region
Reduce emissions and pollution
Reduce fuel expense to employer and employee

Population

Population larger enough to provide an adequate employee pool to hire from
No large congested metropolitan cities

Median Income

No high income communities
Transferred employees will raise the median income

Public Transportation Rating

Lower overall tax burden than that of the greater Washington D.C. region
Existing infrastructure that will benefit from influx to help offset grants or need to increase taxes

Proposed cities of department relocation

Implementation